
NAMA: SAIFUL IBRAHIM ABAS BIN SAIFUL BAHRI
NO MATRIK: 194482
TERJEMAHAN RESEPI
RED CURRANT SLUSH SORBET
Just as with ice cream, the glorious thing about homemade sorbet is that you can make
flavors you could never buy. And the texture is so much better, too: smoother, richer,
without all that icy brittleness. This sorbet is intentionally slushier still: a sluicing with
Cointreau adds an orangey depth and keeps it all from freezing solid.
If you’re not using an ice cream maker, then just pour the sugary fruit purée into
a plastic container and whip it out of the freezer and mush it up in a processor a couple
of times while it freezes, following the instructions for machineless ice cream making on
page 223.
1 ½ pints red currants zest and juice of 1 orange
1 ½ cups granulated sugar 1/3 cup Cointreau
Preheat the oven to 350°F. Put the red currants, stalks and all, into an ovenproof dish and
add the sugar and zest and juice of the orange. Cover with foil and put in the oven for
about 45 minutes, by which time the fruit will become soft and pulpy.
Let the fruit before pushing the mixture through a mouli or other food mill,
or purée it in a blender or food processor. The advantage of a food mill, though, is that
it purées and sieves at the same time. A blended or blitzed mixture will have to be pushed
through a sieve to remove all the seedy, stalky bits. Either way, make sure you use all the
syrupy juice the red currants have made as well, and then stir in the Cointreau.
Put the sorbet mixture into an ice cream maker to freeze and then decant this
vivid puce slush into an airtight container and keep in the freezer until the actual point
of serving.
Serves 6.
YOUGURT LEMBUT RED CURRANT
Sama seperti ais krim,
perkara yang bagus tentang yougurt
lembut red currant adalah
anda boleh membuat satu rasa yang anda tidak boleh beli. Dan teksturnya jauh
lebih baik juga lancar, lebih kaya, tanpa apa-apa ais berperisa. Yougurt ini memounyai ais yang berperisa: air berperisa dengan Cointreau menambah kedalaman sesuatu berwarna
keorenan dan menyimpannya dari pembekuan pepejal.
Jika anda tidak menggunakan pembuat ais krim, maka tuangkan buah segar manis ke dalamnya bekas plastik dan cambuknya keluar dari peti sejuk dan tolak ia ke dalam beberapa kali proses ketika ia membeku, ikut arahan untuk membuat ais krim tanpa mesin halaman 223.
1 ½ gelas currants merah tambah perasa dan jus 1 oren
1 ½ cawan gula pasir 1/3 cawan Cointreau
Panaskan ketuhar hingga 350 ° F. Letakkan currants merah, batang dan semua, ke dalam hidangan ovenproof dan tambah gula dan zest dan jus oren. Tutup dengan kerajang dan masukkan ke dalam oven kira-kira 45 minit, di mana masa itu akan menjadi lembut dan pulu.
Biarkan buahnya sebelum menolak campuran melalui mouli atau kilang makanan lain, atau masukkannya dalam pemproses atau pemproses makanan. Keuntungan dari kilang makanan, bagaimanapun, ia adalah makanan diproses dan penapis pada masa yang sama. Campuran atau bahan tidak perlu ditolak melalui penyaring untuk menghapuskan semua bit yang berbulu. Sama ada cara, pastikan anda menggunakan semua jus sirup, currants merah telah juga digunakan, dan kemudian kacau di Cointreau.
Letakkan campuran serbat ke dalam pembuat ais krim untuk membekukan dan kemudian tuangkan ais yang pekat seakan keunguan jelas meluncur ke dalam bekas kedap udara dan simpan di peti sejuk sehingga titik sebenar berkhidmat.
Hidangan 6.
TERJEMAHAN KERANGKA TEORI
TEORI ANALISIS WACANA BROWN & YULE (1983)
Brown & Yule (1983) telah menyenaraikan empat elemen wacana. Elemen tersebut meliputi elemen pra-andaian, implikatur, rujukan dan inferens. Brown & Yule (1983) juga menyatakan bahawa wacana boleh dianalisis melalui kajian teks, tulisan ujaran dan interaksi.
Pra-andaian
Pra-andaian merupakan pragmatik. Pra-andaian ini telah dipilih berdasarkan anggapan dan andaian kepada apa yang mungkin akan diterima oleh pendengar tanpa rintangan.
Implikatur
Implikatur merupakan pandangan atau yang berkemungkinan. Cadangan atau makna penutur/penulis adalah berbeza dengan apa yang mereka katakana. Implikatur berbentuk implikasi konvensional. Penutur/penulis tidak memberitahu bahawa emej tertentu adalah disebabkan oleh ciri-ciri lain.
Rujukan
Penutur berunding dengan menggunakan ungkapan yang sesuai dan menggabungkan engan ungkapan berbentuk rundingan. Rujukan adalah suatu yang dilakukan oleh seseorang dengan menggunakan ungkapan.
Inferens
Inferens menunjukkan usaha untuk membuat kesimpulan. Selain itu, inferens menjelaskan ujaran atau hubungan antara ujaran. Pelbagai andaian telah dihasilkan dalam beberapa andaian dan kesimpulan.
Teori Stubbs (1983) memfokuskan kepada linguistic wacana.
1. Pendekatan linguistik wacana
2. Kebolehramalan
3. Fonotatik
4. Tatabahasa
5. Intuisi tentang urutan wacana
6. Kebolehramalan.
7. Kebolehramalan dan idealisasi
8. Kawalan struktur bermaksud
9. Wacana Canonical dan idealisasi
10. Analogi
11. Kesimpulan
| Struktur Makro Makna global daripada suatu teks yang dapat diamati daripada topic/tema suatu teks |
| Superstruktur Kerangka suatu teks seperti bahagian pendahuluan, isi, penutup dan kesimpulan |
| Struktur Mikro Makna local daripada suatu teks yang dapat diamati daripada pilihan kata, kalimat dan gaya yang dipakai oleh suatu teks |
Rajah 1 : Teori Analisis Wacana Kritis oleh VanDijk (1977)
| Teori Analisis Wacana Kritis (Fairclough, 1995) |
| Anlisis Tekstual Analisis Wacana Praktis Analisis Praktis Sosial Tatabahasa intertektualiti Ekonomi Tema ● Pra-andaian Pendidikan Leksikal ● Metawacana Politik Metafora ● Penafian Kohesi Interdiskusi Pengulangan ● NaratifKonjunsi ● Perbahasan ● Ekspositori ● Luahan (expressive) |
Rajah 2: Teori Analisis Wacana Kritis oleh Faircloungh (1995)
Tenna (1987) membangunkan teori tentang gaya perbualan dengan mengambil teori Lakoff (1975). Menurut Tennen, peraturan Lakoff terhadap kesopanan terbahagi kepada empat yang berikut:
1. Sikap ramah
2. Jarak
3. Hormat
4. Akrab
| STRATEGI KESOPANAN |
| Bald on-record Kesopanan Positif Contoh: Contoh: kamu Nampak sugul. Boleh saya Bersedia! tolong? Dengar sini… Boleh saya pinjam seratu ringgit? Berikan saya bakul besar itu. Saya ikut kamu ke hospital, jika kamu tidak Lampu itu berwarna hijau. Keberatan. Jemput masuk. Jemput makan. |
| Kesopanan Negitif Off-record Mungkin dia yang mengambil Wah, demakin sejuk dalam bilik ini. Kotak itu, mungkin ! Mahal betul harga kasut di sini. Tolong berikan saya pinggan putih itu. Cantik baju kamu. Kalau begitu, sedikit arahan tidak Diperlukan? Membuang botol kosong merata-rata Tidak dibenarkan. |
Rajah 3: Strategi Kesopanan oleh Brown & Levinson (1987)
Johnstone (2002) pula mengatakan bahawa pendekatan wacana dibahagikan kepada beberapa bahagian.
1. Perkataan dan baris
2. Perenggan dan episode
3. Wacana skemata dan struktur naratif
4. Susunan perbualan
5. Organisasi ayat
6. Kohesi
7. Struktur dan peraturan
| Pendekatan Analisis Wacana (Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2018b) |
| PRA-ANDAIAN EMOSI NILAI DAN BUDAYA BAHASA INFERENS 1. Intuasi 1. Positif 1. Diri 1. Bahasa 1. Rumusan 2. Konteks 2. Negatif 2. Masyarakat pertama/ keseluruhan. ● Penerimaan/ 3. Emosi 3. Adat kedua/ 2. Rumusan topik Penafian Bercampur ● Jujur, ikhlas, baik ketiga. perbincangan. ●Keperluan ● Perangai hati, kasih sayang, 2. Formal/ 3. Penutup kata. ●Perujukan ● Personaliti kerajinan, tidak ●Anafora ● Mood kesyukuran, formal. ●Pengulangan ● Motivasi kesedaran, keser- 3. Kesalahan ●Kekaburan daharnaan. Bahasa. ●penegasan ● Berdikari, hemah- 4. Linguistik Tinggi, keberanian, Kebersihan fizikal Dan metal, kesatuan. ● Hoemat, menghormati, kerjasama, semangat, bermasyarakat. ● Keadilan, kebebasan, nasional. |
Rajah 4: Pendekatan Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim (2018b)
| Pendekatan Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim (2018b) |
| Kandungan Konteks Andaian 1. Tema 1. Tatabahasa 1. Pendapat 2. Latar 2. Perujukan 3. Emosi 3. Persoalan |
Rajah 5: Teori Analisis Wacana
BROWN & YULE THEORY OF THE ANALYSIS (1983)
Brown & Yule (1983) have listed four elements of discourse. These elements include pre-rules, implications, references and inferences. Brown & Yule (1983) also state that discourse can be analyzed through study texts, speeches and interactions.
Pre-love
Predictions are pragmatic. The pre-selection was selected based on the opinion and understanding of what the uninterrupted listener might receive.
Implicit
Implicit is the view or the possibility. The suggestions or meanings of the speakers / writers are different from what they say. Implicit in the form of conventional immigration. Speakers / authors do not indicate that certain emails are caused by other features.
References
Speakers negotiate using appropriate expressions and combine negotiation-based expressions. Referrals are something that someone does using expressions.
Inference
The inference indicates an attempt to draw conclusions. In addition, inference describes words or relationships between words. Various points have been made in several conclusions and conclusions.
Stubbs’s theory (1983) focuses on the linguistic discourse.
1. Linguistic approaches to discourse
2. Predictability
3. Phonotics
4. Grammar
5. Intuition about the order of discourse
6. Predictability.
7. Imagination and idealization
8. Structure control means
9. Canonical discourse and idealization
10. Analogy
11. Conclusion
| Macro structure A global meaning of a text that can be diamized from topic/theme of a text |
| Superstructure The frame of a text such as the advance, body, lid and Conclusion section |
| Micro structure Local meaning of a text that can be worn out of word, sentence, and style of a text |
Diagram 1: Theory of Critical Discourse Analysis by VanDijk (1977)
_____________________________________________________________________
Critical Discourse Analysis Theory (Fairclough, 1995)
_____________________________________________________________________
Textual Anlysis Analysis of Practical Discourse Social Practical Analysis
Economics Intertektualiti Grammar
• Theme ● Pre-assumption Education
● Metawacana Politics
Lexical ● Disclaimer
• Metaphor
Cohesion Interdiscussion
• Repetition ● Narrative
• Conjunction ● Debate
● Expository
● Regurgitation (expressive)
_____________________________________________________________________
Fig. 2: Theory of Critical Discourse Analysis by Faircloungh (1995)
Tenna (1987) Develops theory on conversation style by taking Lakoff theory (1975). According to Tennen, the Lakoff rules of the courtesy are divided into the following four:
1. Friendly attitude
2. Distance
3. Respect
4. Familiar
| STRATEGY OF MONEY |
| Bald on-record Positive Decency Example: Example: You look cool. Can I help? Ready! Can I borrow a hundred dollars? Listen here … I’ll take you to the hospital, if you will Give me that big basket. The light is green. do not mind. Please come in. Eat some food. |
| Negative Decency Off-record Maybe he’s the one who took the box, Wow, it’s getting cold in this room. maybe! The price of shoes here is really expensive. Please give me the white plate. Your clothes are pretty. Then a little instruction is not needed? Throw empty bottles everywhere allowed |
Figure 3: Strategies for Polity by Brown & Levinson (1987)
Johnstone (2002) said that the discourse approach was divided into several parts.
1. Words and rows
2. Paragraphs and episode
3. Skemata Discourse and narrative structure
4. Conversation Order
5. Organization of sentence
6. Kohesi
7. Structure and regulation
| Approach Analysis Discourse (Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2018b) |
| EMOTIONAL ASSUMPTIONS VALUE AND CULTURE INFERENCE LANGUAGE 1. Intuation 1. Positive 1. Self 1. Language 1. Formula 2. Context 2. Negative 2. Society First/ whole. ●Acceptance / 3. Mixed 3. Data Second/ 2. Summary Disclaimer Emotion Third topic ● Requirements ● Temperament ● Honest, sincere, 2. Formal/ disccusion ● Reference ● Personality kind hearted, love, not formal 3. Closing ● Anaphora ● Mood crafts, thankgiving, 3. Language ● Repetition ● Motivation independence error ● Blur ● Be independent, high 4. Linguistic ● Affirmation prudence, courage, physical and mental cleanliness, decency |
| Analysis Approach of Normaliza Abd Rahim discourse (2018b) |
| Content Context Assumptions 1. Theme 1. Grammar 1. Opinion 2. Backlight 2. Referring 3. Emotion 3. Question |
Figure 5: Theory of Discourse Analysis

